Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient characteristics by type of stimulator

From: Sex-specific differences in the efficacy of traditional low frequency versus high frequency spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain

 

HF-SCS

LF-SCS

p-value

n

94

143

 

Sex = Male (%)

54 (57.4)

70 (49.0)

0.251

Age (mean (SD))

61.02 (14.48)

54.07 (15.05)

< 0.001

Ethnicity (%)

  

0.027

 African American

0 (0.0)

2 (1.4)

 

 Caucasian

3 (3.2)

17 (11.9)

 

 Hispanic

9 (9.6)

5 (3.5)

 

 Non-Hispanic

79 (84.0)

111 (77.6)

 

 Unknown (Patient cannot or refuses to declare ethnicity)

3 (3.2)

8 (5.6)

 

Marriage Status (%)

  

0.838

 Married

60 (63.8)

89 (62.2)

 

 Other/Unknown

1 (1.1)

2 (1.4)

 

 Separated/Divorced

13 (13.8)

19 (13.3)

 

 Single

16 (17.0)

30 (21.0)

 

 Widowed

4 (4.3)

3 (2.1)

 

Payor Name (%)

  

< 0.001

 Medicare

30 (31.9)

23 (16.1)

 

 None/Unknown

49 (52.1)

84 (58.7)

 

 Other Government

8 (8.5)

3 (2.1)

 

 Private Insurance

7 (7.4)

28 (19.6)

 

 Workman’s Compensation

0 (0.0)

5 (3.5)

 

Primary Diagnosis for Implant (%)

  

< 0.001

 Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

7 (7.4)

23 (16.1)

 

 Cranial Neuropathy

2 (2.1)

5 (3.5)

 

 Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

37 (39.4)

64 (44.8)

 

 Lumbar Radiculopathy

20 (21.3)

30 (21.0)

 

 Non-Surgical Refractory Back Pain

14 (14.9)

2 (1.4)

 

 Neuropathic Pain

7 (7.4)

17 (11.9)

 

 Other Chronic Pain

7 (7.4)

2 (1.4)

 

Revision or Explant (%)

25 (17.5)

15 (16.0)

0.897

Patient status (%)

  

0.016

 Alive

78 (83.0)

120 (83.9)

 

 Deceased

0 (0.0)

9 (6.3)

 

 Unknown

16 (17.0)

14 (9.8)

Â